A Predictive Model for Neuropsychiatric Disorders Based on Artificial Intelligence and Multimodal Data

Authors

  • Ethan Wilson Department of Neuroscience, Peninsula Campus, Monash University, Clayton, Australia Author
  • Williams Charlotte Department of Neuroscience, Peninsula Campus, Monash University, Clayton, Australia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/d6xmz559

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Predictive Modeling, Multimodal Data Integration, Digital Phenotyping, Neuroimaging, Precision Psychiatry

Abstract

The early and accurate prediction of neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder remains a formidable challenge in clinical psychiatry. The current diagnostic paradigm, heavily reliant on subjective clinical interviews and observable symptomatology, often leads to delays in intervention and suboptimal outcomes. The confluence of artificial intelligence (AI) and the availability of large-scale, multimodal data offers a transformative opportunity to develop objective, data-driven predictive models. This paper proposes a novel, integrated AI framework for predicting the onset and trajectory of neuropsychiatric disorders by synthesizing heterogeneous data modalities, including neuroimaging (structural and functional MRI), genetic (polygenic risk scores), electrophysiological (EEG), digital phenotyping (smartphone and wearable data), and clinical-behavioral data. We employ a hierarchical multimodal deep learning architecture designed to learn both intra-modality and cross-modality interactions, effectively capturing the complex, non-linear relationships that underpin these disorders. Using a simulated dataset representative of a high-risk cohort (N=2,500), our model demonstrated a high predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.91 for predicting transition to psychosis within a two-year period. Significant predictive features included reduced gray matter volume in the prefrontal cortex, aberrant functional connectivity in the default mode network, specific patterns of sleep fragmentation from actigraphy, and vocal prosody changes from smartphone sensors. Furthermore, model interpretation techniques, such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), identified the most contributory features, enhancing the clinical translatability of the model. This study underscores the profound potential of AI-driven, multimodal integration to move psychiatric diagnostics towards a more precise, preventive, and personalized paradigm, while also discussing the ethical considerations and pathways for clinical implementation.

References

[1]Vos, T., Lim, S. S., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K. M., Abbasi, M., Abbasifard, M., ... & Murray, C. J. L. (2020). Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, 396(10258), 1204–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9

[2]Fusar-Poli, P., Borgwardt, S., Bechdolf, A., Addington, J., Riecher-Rössler, A., Schultze-Lutter, F., ... & Yung, A. (2013). The psychosis high-risk state: A comprehensive state-of-the-art review. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.269

[3]Insel, T. R. (2017). Digital phenotyping: Technology for a new science of behavior. JAMA, 318(13), 1215–1216. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.11295

[4]Bzdok, D., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2018). Machine learning for precision psychiatry: Opportunities and challenges. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.11.007

[5]Haijma, S. V., Van Haren, N., Cahn, W., Koolschijn, P. C., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., & Kahn, R. S. (2013). Brain volumes in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis in over 18 000 subjects. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(5), 1129–1138. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs118

[6]Menon, V. (2011). Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: A unifying triple network model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003

[7]Wray, N. R., Lee, S. H., Mehta, D., Vinkhuyzen, A. A., Dudbridge, F., & Middeldorp, C. M. (2014). Research review: Polygenic methods and their application to psychiatric traits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(10), 1068–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12295

[8]Anonymous, My Experience With Psychiatric Services, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Volume 43, Issue 3, 1 May 2017, Pages 478–480, https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbv145

[9]Rasetti, R., & Weinberger, D. R. (2011). Intermediate phenotypes in psychiatric disorders. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 21(3), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2011.02.003

[10]Abdullah, S., Matthews, M., Frank, E., Doherty, G., Gay, G., & Choudhury, T. (2016). Automatic detection of social rhythms in bipolar disorder. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(3), 538–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv200

[11]Orrù, G., Pettersson-Yeo, W., Marquand, A. F., Sartori, G., & Mechelli, A. (2012). Using Support Vector Machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: A critical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1140–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.004

[12]Che, Z., Purushotham, S., Cho, K., Sontag, D., & Liu, Y. (2018). Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 6085. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24271-9

[13]Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874

Downloads

Published

2025-11-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ethan Wilson, & Williams Charlotte. (2025). A Predictive Model for Neuropsychiatric Disorders Based on Artificial Intelligence and Multimodal Data. Digital Neuropsychiatry, 1(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.64229/d6xmz559