Mapping the Disordered Mind: A Computational Framework for Integrating Neuroimaging and Symptom Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/zxdytz96Keywords:
Computational Psychiatry, Neuroimaging, Digital Phenotyping, Data Integration, Transdiagnostic, Biotypes, Manifold Learning, Network NeuroscienceAbstract
The diagnostic categorization in psychiatry, largely based on clinically observed symptom clusters, has proven insufficient for capturing the vast biological and phenomenological heterogeneity within and across psychiatric disorders. This heterogeneity is a primary obstacle to developing targeted, effective treatments. We propose a novel computational framework designed to map the complex, non-linear relationships between distributed neural circuit dysfunctions and the multidimensional space of psychopathology. This framework, which we term the Integrative Neuroclinical Mapping Framework (INMF), moves beyond case-control comparisons to model psychopathology as a system of continuous, overlapping dimensions. The INMF processes high-dimensional data from functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI, sMRI), integrating them with fine-grained, dynamic symptom data acquired through digital phenotyping (e.g., ecological momentary assessment, smartphone sensors). Core to the INMF is a multi-stage analytical pipeline featuring (1) data harmonization and feature extraction using automated preprocessing and source-based morphometry/independent component analysis, (2) manifold learning to uncover low-dimensional latent neural-symptom structures, and (3) graph-based network analysis to model the dynamic interplay between brain networks and symptom domains. We present a proof-of-concept application using a simulated dataset of individuals with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and healthy controls, demonstrating the framework's ability to identify transdiagnostic biotypes that are more homogenous than traditional diagnoses. Our results illustrate how the INMF can delineate distinct neural pathways leading to similar symptomatic expressions (equifinality) and common neural risk factors manifesting as different disorders (multifinality). This framework offers a powerful, data-driven approach for parsing the nosological chaos of psychiatry, with the potential to revolutionize diagnosis, prognostication, and the development of personalized neurotherapeutics.
References
[1]Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748–751. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379
[2]Kapur, S., Phillips, A. G., & Insel, T. R. (2012). Why has it taken so long for biological psychiatry to develop clinical tests and what to do about it? Molecular Psychiatry, 17(12), 1174–1179. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2012.105
[3]Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013). Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine, 11, 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-126
[4]Menon, V. (2011). Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: A unifying triple network model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003
[5]Thompson, P. M., Jahanshad, N., Ching, C. R. K., Salminen, L. E., Thomopoulos, S. I., Bright, J., Baune, B. T., Bertolín, S., Bralten, J., Bruin, W. B., Bülow, R., Chen, J., Chye, Y., Dannlowski, U., de Kovel, C. G. F., Donohoe, G., Eyler, L. T., Faraone, S. V., Favre, P., … ENIGMA Consortium. (2020). ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries. Translational Psychiatry, 10(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0705-1
[6]Clementz, B. A., Sweeney, J. A., Hamm, J. P., Ivleva, E. I., Ethridge, L. E., Pearlson, G. D., Keshavan, M. S., & Tamminga, C. A. (2016). Identification of distinct psychosis biotypes using brain-based biomarkers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(4), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14091200
[7]Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. (2019). Genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders. Cell, 179(7), 1469–1482.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.020
[8]Fornito, A., Zalesky, A., & Breakspear, M. (2015). The connectomics of brain disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3901
[9]Montague, P. R., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J., & Dayan, P. (2012). Computational psychiatry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.018
[10]Torous, J., Kiang, M. V., Lorme, J., & Onnela, J.-P. (2016). New tools for new research in psychiatry: A scalable and customizable platform to empower data driven smartphone research. JMIR Mental Health, 3(2), e16. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.5165
[11]McInnes, L., Healy, J., & Melville, J. (2018). UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426
[12]Vos, T., Lim, S. S., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K. M., Abbas, M., Abbasifard, M., Abbasi-Kangevari, M., Abbastabar, H., Abd-Allah, F., Abdelalim, A., Abdollahi, M., Abdollahpour, I., Abolhassani, H., Aboyans, V., Abrams, E. M., Abreu, L. G., Abrigo, M. R. M., Abu-Raddad, L. J., Abushouk, A. I., … Murray, C. J. L. (2020). Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, 396(10258), 1204–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
[13]Pizzagalli, D. A. (2014). Depression, stress, and anhedonia: Toward a synthesis and integrated model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 393–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185606
[14]Seeley, W. W. (2019). The salience network: A neural system for perceiving and responding to homeostatic demands. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(50), 9878–9882. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1138-17.2019
[15]Borsboom, D. (2017). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20375
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cristina Goh Hao Liu (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.